↓ Skip to main content

Treatment Considerations for HIV-Infected Individuals with Severe Mental Illness

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 439)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Treatment Considerations for HIV-Infected Individuals with Severe Mental Illness
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11904-013-0179-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael B. Blank, Seth Himelhoch, James Walkup, Marlene M. Eisenberg

Abstract

There has been a general recognition of a syndemic that includes HIV/AIDS and serve mental illnesses including schizophrenia, major depression, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and others. The pathophysiology and direction of effects between severe mental illness and HIV infection is less clear however, and relatively little work has been done on prevention and treatment for people with these complex, co-occurring conditions. Here we present the most recent work that has been published on HIV and mental illness. Further, we describe the need for better treatments for "triply diagnosed persons"; those with HIV, mental illness, and substance abuse and dependence. Finally, we describe the potential drug-drug interactions between psychotropic medications and anti-retrovirals, and the need for better treatment guidelines in this area. We describe one example of an individually tailored intervention for persons with serious mental illness and HIV (PATH+) that shows that integrated community-based treatments using advanced practice nurses (APNs) as health navigators can be successful in improving health-related quality of life and reducing the burden of disease in these persons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 31%
Psychology 24 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,266,511
of 23,845,863 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#44
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,338
of 214,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,845,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them