↓ Skip to main content

Patient-Centered Approaches to Health Care

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Care Research and Review, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
393 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient-Centered Approaches to Health Care
Published in
Medical Care Research and Review, July 2013
DOI 10.1177/1077558713496318
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara S. McMillan, Elizabeth Kendall, Adem Sav, Michelle A. King, Jennifer A. Whitty, Fiona Kelly, Amanda J. Wheeler

Abstract

There is growing interest in patient-centered care, but there is little guidance about the interventions required for its delivery and whether it leads to better health outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of patient-centered care interventions for people with chronic conditions. Thirty randomized controlled trials were identified from health-related databases. The findings indicated that most interventions were based on the notion of empowering care and included attempts to educate consumers or prompt them about how to manage a health consultation. Other common interventions focused on training providers in delivering empowering care. Although it was difficult to draw firm conclusions because of the moderate to high risk of bias of the research designs, this review has shown some promising findings from implementing a patient-centered care approach. There appeared to be benefits associated with this model of care in terms of patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 391 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 13%
Researcher 45 11%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Other 26 7%
Other 79 20%
Unknown 102 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 17%
Psychology 31 8%
Social Sciences 27 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 3%
Other 53 13%
Unknown 106 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,928,420
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Medical Care Research and Review
#119
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,162
of 210,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Care Research and Review
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them