↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Anxiety as a Treatment Endpoint in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Measuring Anxiety as a Treatment Endpoint in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1974-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luc Lecavalier, Jeffrey J. Wood, Alycia K. Halladay, Nancy E. Jones, Michael G. Aman, Edwin H. Cook, Benjamin L. Handen, Bryan H. King, Deborah A. Pearson, Victoria Hallett, Katherine Anne Sullivan, Sabrina Grondhuis, Somer L. Bishop, Joseph P. Horrigan, Geraldine Dawson, Lawrence Scahill

Abstract

Despite the high rate of anxiety in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), measuring anxiety in ASD is fraught with uncertainty. This is due, in part, to incomplete consensus on the manifestations of anxiety in this population. Autism Speaks assembled a panel of experts to conduct a systematic review of available measures for anxiety in youth with ASD. To complete the review, the panel held monthly conference calls and two face-to-face meetings over a fourteen-month period. Thirty eight published studies were reviewed and ten assessment measures were examined: four were deemed appropriate for use in clinical trials, although with conditions; three were judged to be potentially appropriate, while three were considered not useful for clinical trials assessing anxiety. Despite recent advances, additional relevant, reliable and valid outcome measures are needed to evaluate treatments for anxiety in ASD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 243 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 13%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 54 22%
Unknown 46 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 116 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 8%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 59 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#16,919,456
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4,025
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,763
of 225,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#47
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.