↓ Skip to main content

Iliopsoas Impingement: A Newly Identified Cause of Labral Pathology in the Hip

Overview of attention for article published in HSS Journal®, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Iliopsoas Impingement: A Newly Identified Cause of Labral Pathology in the Hip
Published in
HSS Journal®, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11420-011-9198-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin G. Domb, Michael K. Shindle, Benjamin McArthur, James E. Voos, Erin M. Magennis, Bryan T. Kelly

Abstract

Labral tears typically occur anterosuperiorly in association with femoroacetabular impingement or dysplasia. Less commonly, labral pathology may occur in an atypical direct anterior location adjacent to the iliopsoas tendon in the absence of bony abnormalities. We hypothesize that this pattern of injury is related to compression or traction on the anterior capsulo-labral complex by the iliopsoas tendon where it crosses the acetabular rim. In a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, we identified 25 patients that underwent isolated, primary, unilateral iliopsoas release and presented for at least 1 year follow-up (mean 21 months). Pre-operative demographics, clinical presentation, intra-operative findings, and outcome questionnaires were analyzed. The injury was treated with a tenotomy of the iliopsoas tendon at the level of the joint line and either labral debridement or repair. Mean post-operative outcome scores were 87.17, 92.46, and 78.8 for the modified Harris Hip Score, activities of daily living Hip Outcome Score, and sports-related score, respectively. The atypical labral injury identified in this study appears to represent a distinct pathological entity, psoas impingement, with an etiology which has not been previously described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 22%
Student > Master 17 15%
Other 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#14,276,973
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from HSS Journal®
#184
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,574
of 120,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HSS Journal®
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.