You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MR Imaging Features of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a3500 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Barakos, R. Sperling, S. Salloway, C. Jack, A. Gass, J.B. Fiebach, D. Tampieri, D. Melançon, Y. Miaux, G. Rippon, R. Black, Y. Lu, H.R. Brashear, H.M. Arrighi, K.A. Morris, M. Grundman |
| Abstract |
AD is one of the few leading causes of death without a disease-modifying drug; however, hopeful agents are in various phases of development. MR imaging abnormalities, collectively referred to as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, have been reported for several agents that target cerebral Aβ burden. ARIA includes ARIA-E, parenchymal or sulcal hyperintensities on FLAIR indicative of parenchymal edema or sulcal effusions, and ARIA-H, hypointense regions on gradient recalled-echo/T2* indicative of hemosiderin deposition. This report describes imaging characteristics of ARIA-E and ARIA-H identified during studies of bapineuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against Aβ. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,224,148
of 23,873,907 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#997
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,236
of 201,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#12
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.