↓ Skip to main content

Immunity, Inflammation, and Bipolar Disorder: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Immunity, Inflammation, and Bipolar Disorder: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11920-013-0387-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nora Hamdani, Raphael Doukhan, Ozlem Kurtlucan, Ryad Tamouza, Marion Leboyer

Abstract

Bipolar disorder is now known to be associated not only with highly prevalent co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders but also with medical comorbidities, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, obesity and thyroid dysfunction. Inflammatory disturbances repeatedly observed in bipolar disorder, can explain some of the comorbidity between bipolar disorder and medical disorder. This revised perspective of bipolar disorders should promote the development of therapeutic tools. Immuno-inflammatory dysfunction may well represent a significant component of the underlying pathophysiology of the disorder. We therefore propose to review the immuno-inflammatory hypothesis in bipolar disorder considering the co-occurence with autoimmune diseases, immunological and inflammatory markers, as well as immuno-genetic markers which could lead to personalized treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 17 12%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Psychology 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,874,818
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#216
of 1,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,332
of 198,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.