↓ Skip to main content

Direction selectivity is computed by active dendritic integration in retinal ganglion cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direction selectivity is computed by active dendritic integration in retinal ganglion cells
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, October 2013
DOI 10.1038/nn.3565
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Sivyer, Stephen R Williams

Abstract

Active dendritic integration is thought to enrich the computational power of central neurons. However, a direct role of active dendritic processing in the execution of defined neuronal computations in intact neural networks has not been established. Here we used multi-site electrophysiological recording techniques to demonstrate that active dendritic integration underlies the computation of direction selectivity in rabbit retinal ganglion cells. Direction-selective retinal ganglion cells fire action potentials in response to visual image movement in a preferred direction. Dendritic recordings revealed that preferred-direction moving-light stimuli led to dendritic spike generation in terminal dendrites, which were further integrated and amplified as they spread through the dendritic arbor to the axon to drive action potential output. In contrast, when light bars moved in a null direction, synaptic inhibition vetoed neuronal output by directly inhibiting terminal dendritic spike initiation. Active dendritic integration therefore underlies a physiologically engaged circuit-based computation in the retina.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 223 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 33%
Researcher 51 22%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Master 18 8%
Professor 14 6%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 37%
Neuroscience 60 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Engineering 13 6%
Psychology 11 5%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 27 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,068,466
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,686
of 5,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,647
of 219,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#21
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.