| Title |
The content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study based on video recordings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp13x674431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris Salisbury, Sunita Procter, Kate Stewart, Leah Bowen, Sarah Purdy, Matthew Ridd, Jose Valderas, Tom Blakeman, David Reeves |
| Abstract |
Demographic and policy changes appear to be increasing the complexity of consultations in general practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 36% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 33% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#711,104
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#299
of 4,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,163
of 226,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.