↓ Skip to main content

Adherence to guidelines and breast cancer patients survival: a population-based cohort study analyzed with a causal inference approach

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Adherence to guidelines and breast cancer patients survival: a population-based cohort study analyzed with a causal inference approach
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10549-017-4210-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Andreano, Paola Rebora, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Antonio Giampiero Russo

Abstract

There is a lack of real-world studies evaluating the impact on survival of an evidence-based pathway of care in breast cancer. The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of adherence to guidelines on long-term survival for a cohort of Italian breast cancer patients. The cohort included incident female breast cancer cases (2007-12), from the registry of the Milan province (Italy), not metastatic at diagnosis and receiving primary surgery. We selected sets of indicators, according to patient and tumor characteristics. We then defined the pathway of care as adherent to guidelines if it fulfilled at least 80% of the indicators. Indicators were measured using different administrative health databases linked on a unique key. A causal inference approach was used, drawing a directed acyclic graph and fitting an inverse probability weighted marginal structural model, accounting for patient's demographic, socioeconomic and tumor characteristics. The analysis included 6333 patients, 69% of them were classified as having an adherent care. Mean age was 61 years (standard deviation, 13.6 years) and half of the patients were in Stage I (50%) at diagnosis. Median follow-up time was 5.6 years. Overall, 5-year survival was 90% (95% CI, 89-91%). The estimated risk of death was 30% lower for patients with adherent than nonadherent care (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77). Our study confirms, in real-world care, the impact on survival of receiving a care pathway adherent to guidelines in non-metastatic breast cancer patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 22 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 26 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,277,723
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,599
of 4,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,687
of 309,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#29
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.