↓ Skip to main content

CO2 Efflux from Cleared Mangrove Peat

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CO2 Efflux from Cleared Mangrove Peat
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021279
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine E. Lovelock, Roger W. Ruess, Ilka C. Feller

Abstract

CO(2) emissions from cleared mangrove areas may be substantial, increasing the costs of continued losses of these ecosystems, particularly in mangroves that have highly organic soils.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 230 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 18%
Student > Master 40 17%
Researcher 38 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 49 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 88 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 10%
Engineering 5 2%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 59 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,682,159
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#63,807
of 193,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,859
of 115,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#624
of 2,073 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,073 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.