| Title |
Iron and citric acid: A fuzzy chemistry of ubiquitous biological relevance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMetals, March 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1009225701332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J.L. Pierre, I. Gautier-Luneau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 22% |
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 26 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 23% |
| Engineering | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,338,695
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#93
of 701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,568
of 41,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them