| Title |
Static and dynamic foot-pressure measurements in clinical orthopaedics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, September 1980
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02443145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. P. Betts, C. I. Franks, T. Duckworth, J. Burke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,863,394
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#21
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234
of 6,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them