↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of primary care models for non-communicable disease interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
Title
A systematic review of primary care models for non-communicable disease interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa
Published in
BMC Primary Care, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12875-017-0613-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Kane, Megan Landes, Christopher Carroll, Amy Nolen, Sumeet Sodhi

Abstract

Chronic diseases, primarily cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, diabetes and cancer, are the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where communicable disease prevalence still outweighs that of non-communicable disease (NCDs), rates of NCDs are rapidly rising and evidence for primary healthcare approaches for these emerging NCDs is needed. A systematic review and evidence synthesis of primary care approaches for chronic disease in SSA. Quantitative and qualitative primary research studies were included that focused on priority NCDs interventions. The method used was best-fit framework synthesis. Three conceptual models of care for NCDs in low- and middle-income countries were identified and used to develop an a priori framework for the synthesis. The literature search for relevant primary research studies generated 3759 unique citations of which 12 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies were quantitative and one used mixed methods. Three higher-level themes of screening, prevention and management of disease were derived. This synthesis permitted the development of a new evidence-based conceptual model of care for priority NCDs in SSA. For this review there was a near-consensus that passive rather than active case-finding approaches are suitable in resource-poor settings. Modifying risk factors among existing patients through advice on diet and lifestyle was a common element of healthcare approaches. The priorities for disease management in primary care were identified as: availability of essential diagnostic tools and medications at local primary healthcare clinics and the use of standardized protocols for diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and referral to specialist care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 428 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 18%
Researcher 59 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 10%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Other 23 5%
Other 77 18%
Unknown 123 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 16%
Social Sciences 27 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Psychology 9 2%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 142 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,081,965
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#400
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,311
of 322,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.