You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oxidized low-density lipoprotein as a biomarker of cardiovascular diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3109/10408363.2014.992063 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreja Trpkovic, Ivana Resanovic, Julijana Stanimirovic, Djordje Radak, Shaker A. Mousa, Desanka Cenic-Milosevic, Danimir Jevremovic, Esma R. Isenovic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 17% |
| Unknown | 64 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 66 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,738,704
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
#15
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,847
of 364,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them