You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multimodality Imaging in Individuals With Anomalous Coronary Arteries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.02.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christoph Gräni, Ronny R. Buechel, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Raymond Y. Kwong |
| Abstract |
Anomalous coronary arteries (ACA) represent a congenital disorder with an anomalous location of the coronary ostium and/or vascular course. Although most individuals with ACA are asymptomatic and remain undiagnosed, some ACA variants are clinically significant leading to symptoms and even adverse cardiac events. Currently, disease prevalence, pathophysiological mechanisms, risks of sudden cardiac death, and the optimal assessment and treatment strategies among subtypes of ACA remain largely unknown. Consequently, there is a lack of guidelines regarding imaging, sport restriction, and treatment options in individuals with ACA at all ages. Cardiac imaging techniques may play a pivotal role in the assessment of individuals with ACA and may offer guidance toward an optimal treatment strategy. This state-of-the-art review highlights current challenges and future perspectives with a special focus on the role of noninvasive multimodality imaging in patients with ACA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 19 | 28% |
| Mexico | 9 | 13% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 19% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 18% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#927,758
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#264
of 2,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,972
of 323,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#5
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.