↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional value of the marine algae wakame (Undaria pinnatifida) and nori (Porphyra purpurea) as food supplements

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Phycology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Nutritional value of the marine algae wakame (Undaria pinnatifida) and nori (Porphyra purpurea) as food supplements
Published in
Journal of Applied Phycology, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10811-012-9951-9
Authors

M. C. Taboada, R. Millán, M. I. Miguez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 16%
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 57 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 35%
Chemistry 18 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Environmental Science 10 5%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 63 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,730,589
of 24,801,176 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#436
of 2,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,803
of 290,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,801,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.