↓ Skip to main content

A practical guide to bioelectrical impedance analysis using the example of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
Title
A practical guide to bioelectrical impedance analysis using the example of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Nutrition Journal, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja Walter-Kroker, Axel Kroker, Muriel Mattiucci-Guehlke, Thomas Glaab

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 314 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 18%
Student > Master 42 13%
Researcher 30 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 6%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 101 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Sports and Recreations 19 6%
Engineering 15 5%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 116 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,678,145
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#801
of 1,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,229
of 109,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.