You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
National Valuation of Monarch Butterflies Indicates an Untapped Potential for Incentive‐Based Conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12065 |
| Authors |
Jay E. Diffendorfer, John B. Loomis, Leslie Ries, Karen Oberhauser, Laura Lopez‐Hoffman, Darius Semmens, Brice Semmens, Bruce Butterfield, Ken Bagstad, Josh Goldstein, Ruscena Wiederholt, Brady Mattsson, Wayne E. Thogmartin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 62% |
| Scientists | 9 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 19% |
| Researcher | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 45 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#342,450
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#105
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,616
of 225,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.