You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Innovations in health care services: The CAALYX system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Medical Informatics, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Artur Rocha, Angelo Martins, José Celso Freire, Maged N. Kamel Boulos, Manuel Escriche Vicente, Robert Feld, Pepijn van de Ven, John Nelson, Alan Bourke, Gearóid ÓLaighin, Claudio Sdogati, Angela Jobes, Leire Narvaiza, Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero |
| Abstract |
This paper describes proposed health care services innovations, provided by a system called CAALYX (Complete Ambient Assisted Living eXperiment). CAALYX aimed to provide healthcare innovation by extending the state-of-the-art in tele-healthcare, by focusing on increasing the confidence of elderly people living autonomously, by building on the knowledge base of the most common disorders and respective characteristic vital sign changes for this age group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 333 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 15% |
| Researcher | 49 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 66 | 19% |
| Unknown | 61 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 90 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 11% |
| Engineering | 37 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 19% |
| Unknown | 78 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Medical Informatics
#1,161
of 1,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,461
of 120,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Medical Informatics
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.