You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Triage of Patients With Moderate to Severe Heart Failure Who Should Be Referred to a Heart Failure Center?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tonje Thorvaldsen, Lina Benson, Marcus Ståhlberg, Ulf Dahlström, Magnus Edner, Lars H. Lund |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate simple criteria for referral of patients from the general practitioner to a heart failure (HF) center. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 26% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#957,535
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,372
of 16,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,546
of 225,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#17
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.