↓ Skip to main content

Paired Associative Stimulation Enforces the Communication between Interconnected Areas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paired Associative Stimulation Enforces the Communication between Interconnected Areas
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, August 2013
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1777-13.2013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Domenica Veniero, Viviana Ponzo, Giacomo Koch

Abstract

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocols induce forms of spike-timing-dependent-plasticity (STDP) when paired pulses are repeatedly applied with different timing over interconnected cortical areas such as the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and the primary motor cortex (M1). However, the assessment of PAS effects is usually limited to M1 through recording of motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. Here, by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with EEG we aimed at investigating PAS effects over both areas (PPC, M1) and the modulation induced on their connectivity in humans. In different PAS conditions, PPC preceded or followed M1 TMS by 5 ms. We found that TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) changed differently according to the long-term depression (LTD) or potentiation (LTP) after-effect assessed by MEPs, but did not vary at PPC level. Moreover, there was no change in local oscillatory power. However, there was a remarkable increase of coherence between the PPC and the M1 areas. When the PAS protocol induced LTD as revealed by MEPs, there was a specific increase of the coherence between PPC and M1 within the beta band. On the contrary, when PAS induced LTP, the coherence crucially increased in the alpha band. The same LTP results were confirmed when rotating the stimulating coil in M1 during the PAS protocol. In conclusion, we report new evidence that opposite STDP-like effects induced by corticocortical PAS are associated with increased communication between involved brain areas and that antithetic forms of STDP-like after-effects result in distinct cortical rhythms connectivity changes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 234 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 22%
Student > Master 42 17%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 45 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 60 25%
Psychology 40 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 12%
Engineering 11 5%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 53 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,351,676
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#20,883
of 23,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,417
of 198,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#284
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.