↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Emotion Modulation in Moral Bioenhancement Debate

Overview of attention for article published in Topoi, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Emotion Modulation in Moral Bioenhancement Debate
Published in
Topoi, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11245-017-9481-9
Authors

Karolina Kudlek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 25%
Psychology 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Topoi
#365
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,697
of 310,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Topoi
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.