| Title |
Microsatellite analysis supports the existence of three cryptic species within the bumble bee Bombus lucorum sensu lato
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-017-0965-3 |
| Authors |
Lorraine McKendrick, Jim Provan, Úna Fitzpatrick, Mark J. F. Brown, Tómas E. Murray, Eckart Stolle, Robert J. Paxton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 17% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,857,421
of 25,332,933 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#460
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,626
of 316,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,332,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.