| Title |
Taxonomy of the order Mononegavirales: update 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Virology, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00705-017-3311-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gaya K. Amarasinghe, Yīmíng Bào, Christopher F. Basler, Sina Bavari, Martin Beer, Nicolás Bejerman, Kim R. Blasdell, Alisa Bochnowski, Thomas Briese, Alexander Bukreyev, Charles H. Calisher, Kartik Chandran, Peter L. Collins, Ralf G. Dietzgen, Olga Dolnik, Ralf Dürrwald, John M. Dye, Andrew J. Easton, Hideki Ebihara, Qi Fang, Pierre Formenty, Ron A. M. Fouchier, Elodie Ghedin, Robert M. Harding, Roger Hewson, Colleen M. Higgins, Jian Hong, Masayuki Horie, Anthony P. James, Dàohóng Jiāng, Gary P. Kobinger, Hideki Kondo, Gael Kurath, Robert A. Lamb, Benhur Lee, Eric M. Leroy, Ming Li, Andrea Maisner, Elke Mühlberger, Sergey V. Netesov, Norbert Nowotny, Jean L. Patterson, Susan L. Payne, Janusz T. Paweska, Michael N. Pearson, Rick E. Randall, Peter A. Revill, Bertus K. Rima, Paul Rota, Dennis Rubbenstroth, Martin Schwemmle, Sophie J. Smither, Qisheng Song, David M. Stone, Ayato Takada, Calogero Terregino, Robert B. Tesh, Keizo Tomonaga, Noël Tordo, Jonathan S. Towner, Nikos Vasilakis, Viktor E. Volchkov, Victoria Wahl-Jensen, Peter J. Walker, Beibei Wang, David Wang, Fei Wang, Lin-Fa Wang, John H. Werren, Anna E. Whitfield, Zhichao Yan, Gongyin Ye, Jens H. Kuhn |
| Abstract |
In 2017, the order Mononegavirales was expanded by the inclusion of a total of 69 novel species. Five new rhabdovirus genera and one new nyamivirus genus were established to harbor 41 of these species, whereas the remaining new species were assigned to already established genera. Furthermore, non-Latinized binomial species names replaced all paramyxovirus and pneumovirus species names, thereby accomplishing application of binomial species names throughout the entire order. This article presents the updated taxonomy of the order Mononegavirales as now accepted by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 23 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 58 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,771,197
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#148
of 4,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,178
of 311,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#4
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.