↓ Skip to main content

Gustatory pleasure and pain. The offset of acute physical pain enhances responsiveness to taste

Overview of attention for article published in Appetite, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gustatory pleasure and pain. The offset of acute physical pain enhances responsiveness to taste
Published in
Appetite, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brock Bastian, Jolanda Jetten, Matthew J. Hornsey

Abstract

The idea that pain may serve to produce pleasurable states has been noted by theorists and, more recently, substantiated by empirical findings. We explored the possibility that, beyond producing positive hedonic states, the offset of pain may serve to enhance the capacity for gustatory pleasure. Across three studies we examined whether pain offset may enhance responsiveness to taste. In Study 1 participants enjoyed chocolate more after the experience of pain compared to completing a similar but non-painful task. In Study 2, pain offset increased the perceived intensity of a range of tastes, both pleasant and unpleasant, indicating that the effects of pain offset are not limited to the processing of positive hedonic stimuli. In Study 3, pain offset increased sensitivity to different flavors. The findings suggest that the offset of acute pain increases awareness of, and therefore sensitivity to, gustatory input, thereby enhancing the capacity for gustatory pleasure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#758,293
of 25,052,270 outputs
Outputs from Appetite
#482
of 4,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,053
of 318,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Appetite
#17
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,052,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.