↓ Skip to main content

Strategic tillage in conservation agricultural systems of north-eastern Australia: why, where, when and how?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Strategic tillage in conservation agricultural systems of north-eastern Australia: why, where, when and how?
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-8937-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yash Pal Dang, Anna Balzer, Mark Crawford, Vivian Rincon-Florez, Hongwei Liu, Alice Rowena Melland, Diogenes Antille, Shreevatsa Kodur, Michael John Bell, Jeremey Patrick Milroy Whish, Yunru Lai, Nikki Seymour, Lilia Costa Carvalhais, Peer Schenk

Abstract

Farmers often resort to an occasional tillage (strategic tillage (ST)) operation to combat constraints of no-tillage (NT) farming systems. There are conflicting reports regarding impacts of ST and a lack of knowledge around when, where and how ST is implemented to maximise its benefits without impacting negatively on soil and environment. We established 14 experiments during 2012-2015 on farms with long-term history of continuous NT to (i) quantify the associated risks and benefits to crop productivity, soil and environmental health and (ii) explore key factors that need to be considered in decisions to implement ST in an otherwise NT system. Results showed that introduction of ST reduced weed populations and improved crop productivity and profitability in the first year after tillage, with no impact in subsequent 4 years. Soil properties were not impacted in Vertosols; however, Sodosols and Dermosols suffered short-term negative soil health impacts (e.g. increased bulk density). A Sodosol and a Dermosol also posed higher risks of runoff and associated loss of nutrients and sediment during intense rainfall after ST. The ST reduced plant available water in the short term, which could result in unreliable sowing opportunities for the following crop especially in semi-arid climate that prevails in north-eastern Australia. The results show that generally, there were no significant differences in crop productivity and soil health between tillage implements and tillage frequencies between ST and NT. The study suggests that ST can be a viable strategy to manage constraints of NT systems, with few short-term soil and environmental costs and some benefits such as short-term farm productivity and profitability and reduced reliance on herbicides.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 23%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 30 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 34%
Environmental Science 9 10%
Engineering 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 35 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,057,216
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#3,099
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,898
of 312,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#63
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.