| Title |
Valuation of mangrove ecosystem services based on emergy: a case study in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13762-013-0458-y |
| Authors |
S. Zhao, C. Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,976,997
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
#178
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,378
of 314,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.