| Title |
Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geographical Sciences, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11442-010-0483-4 |
| Authors |
Jiyuan Liu, Zengxiang Zhang, Xinliang Xu, Wenhui Kuang, Wancun Zhou, Shuwen Zhang, Rendong Li, Changzhen Yan, Dongsheng Yu, Shixin Wu, Nan Jiang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 23% |
| Researcher | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 82 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 49 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 43 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 9% |
| Engineering | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 107 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geographical Sciences
#36
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,283
of 105,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geographical Sciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them