| Title |
Design of a 3D Chirp Sub-bottom Imaging System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Geophysical Research, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11001-005-3715-8 |
| Authors |
Jonathan M. Bull, Martin Gutowski, Justin K. Dix, Timothy J. Henstock, Peter Hogarth, Timothy G. Leighton, Paul R. White |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 32% |
| Researcher | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 60% |
| Engineering | 5 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,524,541
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Marine Geophysical Research
#29
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,431
of 57,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Geophysical Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them