↓ Skip to main content

The ecology and management of mammal invasions in forests

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
The ecology and management of mammal invasions in forests
Published in
Biological Invasions, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10530-017-1421-5
Authors

A. David M. Latham, Bruce Warburton, Andrea E. Byrom, Roger P. Pech

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 37%
Environmental Science 14 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,886,132
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#2,030
of 2,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,245
of 309,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#48
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.