You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
我が国における分化型甲状腺癌の放射性ヨード内用療法:アブレーションとリコンビナントヒトTSH(rhTSH,タイロゲンⓇ)の有用性
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.11226/jaesjsts.29.3_230 |
| Authors |
高見 博, 伊藤 公一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#108
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,111
of 206,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.