Title |
CARS 2016—Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Proceedings of the 30th International Congress and Exhibition Heidelberg, Germany, June 21–25, 2016
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11548-016-1412-5 |
Pubmed ID |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 147 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
Researcher | 12 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 17% |
Unknown | 27 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 32 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 19% |
Engineering | 22 | 15% |
Design | 4 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 24 | 16% |
Unknown | 35 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,740,510
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#85
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,954
of 333,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.