↓ Skip to main content

Role of Immune-Inflammatory and Oxidative and Nitrosative Stress Pathways in the Etiology of Depression: Therapeutic Implications

Overview of attention for article published in CNS Drugs, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Role of Immune-Inflammatory and Oxidative and Nitrosative Stress Pathways in the Etiology of Depression: Therapeutic Implications
Published in
CNS Drugs, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40263-013-0119-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Anderson, Michael Berk, Olivia Dean, Steven Moylan, Michael Maes

Abstract

Accumulating data have led to a re-conceptualization of depression that emphasizes the role of immune-inflammatory processes, coupled to oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS). These in turn drive the production of neuroregulatory tryptophan catabolites (TRYCATs), driving tryptophan away from serotonin, melatonin, and N-acetylserotonin production, and contributing to central dysregulation. This revised perspective better encompasses the diverse range of biological changes occurring in depression and in doing so provides novel and readily attainable treatment targets, as well as potential screening investigations prior to treatment initiation. We briefly review the role that immune-inflammatory, O&NS, and TRYCAT pathways play in the etiology, course, and treatment of depression. We then discuss the pharmacological treatment implications arising from this, including the potentiation of currently available antidepressants by the adjunctive use of immune- and O&NS-targeted therapies. The use of such a frame of reference and the treatment benefits attained are likely to have wider implications and utility for depression-associated conditions, including the neuroinflammatory and (neuro)degenerative disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 131 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 18%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 16%
Neuroscience 14 10%
Psychology 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,765,501
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from CNS Drugs
#1,046
of 1,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,782
of 212,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CNS Drugs
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.