↓ Skip to main content

Association between CACNA1C gene polymorphisms and ritodrine-induced adverse events in preterm labor patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Association between CACNA1C gene polymorphisms and ritodrine-induced adverse events in preterm labor patients
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00228-017-2222-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Young Baek, Han Sung Hwang, Jin Young Park, Jee Eun Chung, Kyung Eun Lee, Gwan Yung Lee, Jin Won Seong, Jeong Yee, Young Ju Kim, Hye Sun Gwak

Abstract

As a tocolytic agent, ritodrine has been used in European and Asian countries but has lost popularity due to safety concerns. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between adverse drug events caused by ritodrine and the CACNA1C polymorphisms in preterm labor patients. Data were collected from medical records including maternal age, gestational age, body mass index, dilation score, effacement score, modified Bishop score, maximum infusion rate, and adverse drug events. Five single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the CACNA1C gene (rs10774053, rs215994, rs215976, rs2239128, and rs2041135) were analyzed. One hundred eighty-six patients were included, 33 of whom had adverse drug events. A allele carriers of rs10774053 showed about 0.293-fold lower adverse drug events than GG genotype carriers (p = 0.012, absolute risk reduction = 16.5%) after adjusting for other confounding variables; the number needed to genotype for preventing one patient with GG genotype from suffering higher incidence of adverse drug events was calculated to be 14.6. Increase in maximum infusion rate of 1 mL/h was associated with a 1.03-fold (95% CI 1.01~1.06, p = 0.005) increased risk of adverse drug events. None of the patients with a CC genotype of rs215994 had adverse drug events, whereas 22.1% of the T allele carriers had adverse drug events. This study showed that CACNA1C gene polymorphisms could alter the probability of adverse drug event risk when ritodrine is used in preterm labor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 36%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Professor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Psychology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,413,129
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#2,398
of 2,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,000
of 309,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#25
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.