↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of digestive proteinases from the Antarctic krill Euphasia superba as potential chemonucleolytic agents

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, April 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of digestive proteinases from the Antarctic krill Euphasia superba as potential chemonucleolytic agents
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, April 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00443388
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Melrose, A. Hall, C. Macpherson, C. R. Bellenger, P. Ghosh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Professor 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2011.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#310
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,822
of 25,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them