↓ Skip to main content

Pitfalls and tips in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Abdominal Radiology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Pitfalls and tips in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy
Published in
Abdominal Radiology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00261-016-1020-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Mausner Geffen, C. Slywotzky, G. Bennett

Abstract

Women of reproductive age with pelvic pain, vaginal bleeding, and a positive pregnancy test often require evaluation with pelvic ultrasound. In these situations, the primary role of pelvic ultrasound is to differentiate an ectopic pregnancy from either a normal or abnormal intrauterine pregnancy. While an accurately performed and interpreted pelvic ultrasound results in rapid diagnosis and management, numerous diagnostic pitfalls can lead to negative outcomes. Therefore, familiarity with the appropriate laboratory tests, sonographic technique, and imaging features of ectopic pregnancy is essential for all radiologists. We present a review of ectopic pregnancy cases from our institution with attention to common pitfalls and troubleshooting tips for physicians who perform and interpret pelvic ultrasounds. We also present recently published literature to aid in the management of first trimester pregnancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 22%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 24 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 25 37%