↓ Skip to main content

The role of Asia in the global trade in CITES II-listed poison arrow frogs: hopping from Kazakhstan to Lebanon to Thailand and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
The role of Asia in the global trade in CITES II-listed poison arrow frogs: hopping from Kazakhstan to Lebanon to Thailand and beyond
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10531-010-9814-0
Authors

Vincent Nijman, Chris R. Shepherd

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 4%
United States 4 4%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 89 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 16 16%
Other 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 50%
Environmental Science 24 24%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,131
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,644
of 95,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.