↓ Skip to main content

Fourier dimension and spectral gaps for hyperbolic surfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Geometric and Functional Analysis, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Fourier dimension and spectral gaps for hyperbolic surfaces
Published in
Geometric and Functional Analysis, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00039-017-0412-0
Authors

Jean Bourgain, Semyon Dyatlov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 9 90%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2017.
All research outputs
#14,615,513
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from Geometric and Functional Analysis
#123
of 180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,169
of 315,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geometric and Functional Analysis
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them