You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Germline Genetic Contributions to Risk for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Barrett’s Esophagus, and Gastroesophageal Reflux
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djt303 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Weronica E. Ek, David M. Levine, Mauro D’Amato, Nancy L. Pedersen, Patrik K. E. Magnusson, Francesca Bresso, Lynn E. Onstad, Peter T. Schmidt, Hans Törnblom, Helena Nordenstedt, Yvonne Romero, Wong-Ho Chow, Liam J. Murray, Marilie D. Gammon, Geoffrey Liu, Leslie Bernstein, Alan G. Casson, Harvey A. Risch, Nicholas J. Shaheen, Nigel C. Bird, Brian J. Reid, Douglas A. Corley, Laura J. Hardie, Weimin Ye, Anna H. Wu, Marco Zucchelli, Tim D. Spector, Pirro Hysi, Thomas L. Vaughan, David C. Whiteman, Stuart MacGregor |
| Abstract |
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is an increasingly common cancer with poor survival. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the main precursor to EA, and every year 0.12% to 0.5% of BE patients progress to EA. BE typically arises on a background of chronic gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), one of the risk factors for EA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2014.
All research outputs
#17,364,859
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#6,636
of 7,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,262
of 225,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#75
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.