↓ Skip to main content

Characterisation of a murine model of the late asthmatic response

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Characterisation of a murine model of the late asthmatic response
Published in
Respiratory Research, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12931-017-0541-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie Baker, Kristof Raemdonck, Robert J. Snelgrove, Maria G. Belvisi, Mark A. Birrell

Abstract

The incidence of asthma is increasing at an alarming rate. While the current available therapies are effective, there are associated side effects and they fail to adequately control symptoms in all patient subsets. In the search to understand disease pathogenesis and find effective therapies hypotheses are often tested in animal models before progressing into clinical studies. However, current dogma is that animal model data is often not predictive of clinical outcome. One possible reason for this is the end points measured such as antigen-challenge induced late asthmatic response (LAR) is often used in early clinical development, but seldom in animal model systems. As the mouse is typically selected as preferred species for pre-clinical models, we wanted to characterise and probe the validity of a murine model exhibiting an allergen induced LAR. C57BL/6 mice were sensitised with antigen and subsequently topically challenged with the same antigen. The role of Alum(TM) adjuvant, glucocorticoid, long acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LAMA), TRPA1, CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, B cells, Mast cells and IgE were determined in the LAR using genetically modified mice and a range of pharmacological tools. Our data showed that unlike other features of asthma (e.g. cellular inflammation, elevated IgE levels and airway hyper-reactivity (AHR) the LAR required Alum(TM)adjuvant. Furthermore, the LAR appeared to be sensitive to glucocorticoid and required CD4(+) T cells. Unlike in other species studied, the LAR was not sensitive to LAMA treatment nor required the TRPA1 ion channel, suggesting that airway sensory nerves are not involved in the LAR in this species. Furthermore, the data suggested that CD8(+) T cells and the mast cell-B-cell - IgE axis appear to be protective in this murine model. Together we can conclude that this model does feature steroid sensitive, CD4(+) T cell dependent, allergen induced LAR. However, collectively our data questions the validity of using the murine pre-clinical model of LAR in the assessment of future asthma therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,173,117
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,601
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,394
of 324,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#45
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.