You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum: Corrigendum: Antibiotic treatment at delivery shapes the initial oral microbiome in neonates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep45615 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luisa F. Gomez-Arango, Helen L. Barrett, H. David. McIntyre, Leonie K. Callaway, Mark Morrison, Marloes Dekker Nitert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,952,325
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#31,016
of 123,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,384
of 310,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,148
of 4,243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.