↓ Skip to main content

Learning at large conferences: from the ‘sage on the stage’ to contemporary models of learning

Overview of attention for article published in Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Learning at large conferences: from the ‘sage on the stage’ to contemporary models of learning
Published in
Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40037-017-0351-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dario Torre, Annalisa Manca, Steven Durning, Janusz Janczukowicz, David Taylor, Jennifer Cleland

Abstract

To explore and evaluate the affordances of a flipped classroom model applied to a research paper session within the professional development opportunity of a large conference setting. Authors were invited to present their research papers in a flipped classroom presentation format at two large, multi-national conferences. Before the session, authors and moderators met online to clarify features of the session, and preparation of the material. The research material was then posted online before the conference, to allow access by meeting attendees. During the sessions, moderators encouraged the audience to actively participate. An evaluation form was collected from the audience at the end of each session. Participants found the session valuable, and appreciated the opportunity to engage in a meaningful dialogue with colleagues. However, the majority of the audience did not access the materials in advance. Lack of time, or technology-related issues were mentioned as potential challenges to such format. In the context of a large conference, a 'flipped session' format can facilitate active learning and a participatory culture of inquiry. However, to change the nature of how individuals learn collaboratively at large conferences means a change in the culture of continuous professional learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Lecturer 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,000,874
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#94
of 575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,273
of 325,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.