You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of two commonly used reference materials for exercise bicycle tests with a Swedish clinical database of patients with normal outcome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Physiology & Functional Imaging, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1111/cpf.12097 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
L. Brudin, L. Jorfeldt, O. Pahlm |
Abstract |
Reference values for working capacity, blood pressure, heart rate, perceived exertion, etc. during bicycle exercise tests have been sought after for many years. This is because earlier commonly used reference values for physical work capacity have been either too low or too high when compared to the clinical experience of several Swedish departments of clinical physiology. The aim of the study was to compare two commonly used reference materials with normal outcomes from a clinical database. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Physiology & Functional Imaging
#467
of 697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,271
of 225,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Physiology & Functional Imaging
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.