↓ Skip to main content

Electrochemotherapy Treatment of Locally Advanced and Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of a Non‐Comparative Phase II Study

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Electrochemotherapy Treatment of Locally Advanced and Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of a Non‐Comparative Phase II Study
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00268-013-2321-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca G. Campana, Giuseppe Bianchi, Simone Mocellin, Sara Valpione, Laura Campanacci, Antonella Brunello, Davide Donati, Elisabetta Sieni, Carlo R. Rossi

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate the activity, toxicity, and feasibility of electrochemotherapy (ECT) in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Materials Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,702,587
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,339
of 4,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,673
of 212,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#33
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.