↓ Skip to main content

Randomized Trial of C5a Receptor Inhibitor Avacopan in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
457 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized Trial of C5a Receptor Inhibitor Avacopan in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
Published in
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, April 2017
DOI 10.1681/asn.2016111179
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R W Jayne, Annette N Bruchfeld, Lorraine Harper, Matthias Schaier, Michael C Venning, Patrick Hamilton, Volker Burst, Franziska Grundmann, Michel Jadoul, István Szombati, Vladimír Tesař, Mårten Segelmark, Antonia Potarca, Thomas J Schall, Pirow Bekker

Abstract

Alternative C activation is involved in the pathogenesis of ANCA-associated vasculitis. However, glucocorticoids used as treatment contribute to the morbidity and mortality of vasculitis. We determined whether avacopan (CCX168), an orally administered, selective C5a receptor inhibitor, could replace oral glucocorticoids without compromising efficacy. In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, adults with newly diagnosed or relapsing vasculitis received placebo plus prednisone starting at 60 mg daily (control group), avacopan (30 mg, twice daily) plus reduced-dose prednisone (20 mg daily), or avacopan (30 mg, twice daily) without prednisone. All patients received cyclophosphamide or rituximab. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score by week 12 and no worsening in any body system. We enrolled 67 patients, 23 in the control and 22 in each of the avacopan groups. Clinical response at week 12 was achieved in 14 of 20 (70.0%) control patients, 19 of 22 (86.4%) patients in the avacopan plus reduced-dose prednisone group (difference from control 16.4%; two-sided 90% confidence limit, -4.3% to 37.1%; P=0.002 for noninferiority), and 17 of 21 (81.0%) patients in the avacopan without prednisone group (difference from control 11.0%; two-sided 90% confidence limit, -11.0% to 32.9%; P=0.01 for noninferiority). Adverse events occurred in 21 of 23 (91%) control patients, 19 of 22 (86%) patients in the avacopan plus reduced-dose prednisone group, and 21 of 22 (96%) patients in the avacopan without prednisone group. In conclusion, C5a receptor inhibition with avacopan was effective in replacing high-dose glucocorticoids in treating vasculitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 377 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 16%
Other 49 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 10%
Student > Master 24 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 78 21%
Unknown 106 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 40%
Immunology and Microbiology 25 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 118 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#264,086
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
#102
of 5,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,548
of 325,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
#6
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.