| Title |
Testing single-sample estimators of effective population size in genetically structured populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-013-0518-3 |
| Authors |
Clare E. Holleley, Richard A. Nichols, Michael R. Whitehead, Aaron T. Adamack, Melissa R. Gunn, William B. Sherwin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 35% |
| Researcher | 21 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,765,501
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#820
of 1,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,417
of 197,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.