Title |
Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy compared with routine care on self-reported health status, general well-being, diabetes-specific quality of life and treatment satisfaction in screen-detected type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diabetologia, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00125-013-3011-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maureen Van den Donk, Simon J. Griffin, Rebecca K. Stellato, Rebecca K. Simmons, Annelli Sandbæk, Torsten Lauritzen, Kamlesh Khunti, Melanie J. Davies, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Nicholas J. Wareham, Guy E. H. M. Rutten |
Abstract |
The study aimed to examine the effects of intensive treatment (IT) vs routine care (RC) on patient-reported outcomes after 5 years in screen-detected diabetic patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 18% |
Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Other | 28 | 19% |
Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 31% |
Psychology | 15 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 12% |
Unknown | 43 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,472,047
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,649
of 5,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,168
of 210,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#25
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.