| Title |
Forest protection in Central India: do differences in monitoring by state and local institutions result in diverse social and ecological impacts?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-017-1344-6 |
| Authors |
Shivani Agarwal, Aniruddha Marathe, Rucha Ghate, Jagdish Krishnaswamy, Harini Nagendra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 5 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Thailand | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 15 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,496,181
of 24,969,131 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#665
of 2,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,361
of 315,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,969,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.