↓ Skip to main content

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and extremes of body weight—a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and extremes of body weight—a systematic literature review
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00392-017-1102-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raffaele De Caterina, Gregory Y. H. Lip

Abstract

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) exert their anticoagulant effect closely related to their plasma concentrations. Since their distribution volume is related to body weight (and its correlates, i.e., surface area and body mass index, BMI), extremes in body weight may affect their efficacy or safety. Four NOACs are currently available for long-term use, with few exceptions, in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate, and the factor (F) Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. Experience in patients with low (<50 kg) or extremely high (>150 kg) body weight is still quite limited, as such patients were rare in registration trials and sometimes directly excluded. In general, increased bleeding and higher mortality rates are observed in patients weighing <50 kg compared with patients weighing 50-100 kg. This may however also be explained by the presence of underlying conditions such as cancer. At the opposite end of the spectrum of body weight, lower antithrombotic efficacy may occur, perhaps due to the dilutional effect of a higher distribution volume. In this article, we review the pertinent literature and analyze the effects of low or high body weight on anticoagulant activity and clinical outcomes of the NOACs, their dose recommendations, and areas of uncertainty.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Other 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 36 35%