↓ Skip to main content

The Genetics of Infertility: Current Status of the Field

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genetic Medicine Reports, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 120)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
The Genetics of Infertility: Current Status of the Field
Published in
Current Genetic Medicine Reports, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40142-013-0027-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Zorrilla, Alexander N. Yatsenko

Abstract

Infertility is a relatively common health condition, affecting nearly 7% of all couples. Clinically, it is a highly heterogeneous pathology with a complex etiology that includes environmental and genetic factors. It has been estimated that nearly 50% of infertility cases are due to genetic defects. Hundreds of studies with animal knockout models convincingly showed infertility to be caused by gene defects, single or multiple. However, despite enormous efforts, progress in translating basic research findings into clinical studies has been challenging. The genetic causes remain unexplained for the vast majority of male or female infertility patients. A particular difficulty is the huge number of candidate genes to be studied; there are more than 2,300 genes expressed in the testis alone, and hundreds of those genes influence reproductive function in humans and could contribute to male infertility. At present, there are only a handful of genes or genetic defects that have been shown to cause, or to be strongly associated with, primary infertility. Yet, with completion of the human genome and progress in personalized medicine, the situation is rapidly changing. Indeed, there are 10-15 new gene tests, on average, being added to the clinical genetic testing list annually.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 262 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 14%
Student > Master 28 11%
Researcher 18 7%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 87 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 93 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,393,008
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetic Medicine Reports
#4
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,624
of 223,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetic Medicine Reports
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them